Few regulatory actions have left a deeper mark on crypto markets than the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple . The case reshaped U.S. exchange access, stalled institutional participation, and intensified long-standing suspicions that power dynamics—not just legal theory—guided enforcement choices. New documents have resurfaced, sparking renewed suspicions and putting them back at the center of the discussion. That renewed focus follows a post by Patrick L Riley, who revisited early blockchain correspondence, funding records, and academic connections to argue that Ripple’s legal troubles cannot be viewed in isolation. His analysis urges readers to examine the formative years of crypto, when investor influence and institutional relationships quietly shaped the ecosystem. A 2014 Email Reveals Investor Conflict A leaked 2014 email from files linked to Jeffrey Epstein anchors the discussion. In the message, investor Austin Hill contacted Epstein and Joichi Ito to raise concerns about their involvement with Stellar , which Hill described as a direct competitor to Ripple. He warned that backing “two horses in the same race” damaged the ecosystem his company aimed to build. The email confirms that early blockchain development involved active investor maneuvering. Capital providers openly sought to limit competition and protect favored networks. While the message does not reference regulators or XRP enforcement, it documents how financial influence shaped outcomes years before legal scrutiny emerged. I told you all 31 Dec 2022 that Gary Gensler was directed through Epstein and Mossad to go after Ripple and XRP. Meanwhile the Bitcoin foundation was backed by Epstein. Now you know it is true. pic.twitter.com/ouOjMYeNQx — Patrick L Riley (@Acquired_Savant) January 31, 2026 Epstein’s Documented Bitcoin Involvement Public disclosures released years later confirm that Epstein provided funding to Bitcoin Core developers through the Bitcoin Foundation between 2011 and 2014. The support happened when the foundation was internally unstable, and it’s based on facts, not rumors. These disclosures established Epstein’s participation in Bitcoin’s early infrastructure. They do not create intent to suppress Ripple or direct regulatory actions. The evidence shows funding relationships, not enforcement strategy. Gary Gensler and MIT Connections Riley’s argument also highlights professional overlap between SEC Chair Gary Gensler and Joichi Ito. Ito recruited Gensler to teach blockchain-focused courses at MIT Media Lab, where Ito served as director before resigning amid revelations about Epstein-linked donations. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 This shared academic history provides context but not proof. No primary documents, sworn testimony, or peer-reviewed findings demonstrate that Epstein—or any intelligence agency—directed Gensler’s conduct at the SEC. What the Evidence Supports—and Where It Stops The verified record supports several facts. Epstein funded Bitcoin-related initiatives. Early investors openly intervened in competitive blockchain dynamics. Gensler and Ito shared professional ties at MIT. The SEC sued Ripple in December 2020, claiming they sold securities without registering them. The record does not confirm a directive ordering Gensler to target Ripple or XRP. Allegations involving coordinated suppression or intelligence involvement remain unproven. Separating Documentation From Interpretation Riley’s claims echo broader frustration within crypto over perceived regulatory inconsistency. The newly revealed email and funding records shed light on early power dynamics, but it’s crucial to separate facts from interpretation. The Ripple case reshaped crypto regulation regardless of motive. Until new primary evidence emerges, the facts invite scrutiny—but they demand caution. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Gary Gensler Was Directed to Go After Ripple and XRP. Here’s the Proof appeared first on Times Tabloid .